Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilary Duff Chart History

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 08:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hilary Duff Chart History

OK, when this article started, I put a "mergeto" header on it, but now, this is getting out of hand. We're supposed to have an article on every single and every album she has ever released, for every chart in the world? To begin with, there is not a single cite for any of this information. For another, this violates WP:NOT, as it's a collection of unencylopedic information. Imagine if we did this for every music group that has ever existed. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Good encyclopedic information on this important star, but a merge would be OK if the Duff article is not too long. Of course, I favour keeping The Beatles record sales, worldwide charts along with other articles of this type. Don't think we should do it for every group, just the ones with widescale chart success. -- JJay 03:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
  • ...in other words, every group whose fans are editing WP. —Wahoofive (talk) 04:56, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
    • I have no idea who edits these articles. Am I a fan of any of the articles I edit? What a strange concept. But I guess, if Duff, or Beatles or Bach fans want to contribute, there's probably no harm in it. As long as the result adheres to the project goals, like in this case. -- JJay 05:03, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge. It says "Redio"... Anyways. -- WB 07:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Zoe. -- Kjkolb 08:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete based on what Zoe said. --Rob 09:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Move to Hilary Duff discography and cleanup, infusing any relevant content from the main article. -- Grev 09:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge per above. Blackcats 11:07, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• This would go majorly out of control if we mentioned all motable charts her songs were in... I'm on the fence on this.. -Mgm|^(talk) 12:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unencyclopedic chartcruft. Zunaid 12:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Move to Hilary Duff discography and add any relevent info from Hilary Duff, as per Grev. Evil Eye 13:28, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Zoe is right. Eusebeus 19:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 21:16, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Zoe. I was going to vote merge, but the more I read Zoe's nom the more it convinced me. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 21:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Oh, good lord. Delete. Note: it appears to have been moved to Hilary Duff Discography Info, where it's equally crufty. --Calton | Talk 00:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I agree with Jjay. It's very encyclopediec. Plus the page is going to be too long at the end of editing. It does not say "Redio" either. It's new Calton it will be edited better. So now is not a good time to determine. Give it a few weeks it'll look much better. Trust me. Oh yeah, Zoe this artist has had so much chart history she needs this page. Unlike some others. If every group had a page like this it would be scary. How about if the artist has 4 albums they can finally have their own chart page. If they have over 20 charts.Tcatron565
  • If every group had a page like this it would be scary. First unchallengable thing you've said. And by the way, don't delete the AFD tag again. --Calton | Talk 04:22, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unnecessary detail MattHucke^(t) 18:19, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --NaconKantari 23:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.