Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highland hills middle school

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus (10 keep, 8 delete, 3 merge). Robert T | @ | C 01:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Highland hills middle school moved to Highland Hills Middle School

While I'm usually OK with school articles, this particular instance gives no particular reason why the school is in any way notable. I see no reason why it should remain in Wikipedia Bluap 17:38, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete — I'm all for keeping high school and up, but I tend to think middle schools need to be notable in some manner. Of course the article could be merged into a school district page, which would work just as well. — RJH 18:17, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete non-famous schools below the high-school level. Particularly schools with no history whatsoever (this one only opened in 2004!) — Haeleth Talk 18:32, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep I have entered into a voting pact at [[1]]. You should join in the discussion there. Hipocrite - «Talk» 20:38, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak yak yak ł blah blah blah} 20:59, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Stub creation on legitimate topics should not be discouraged. CalJW 23:55, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
    • I disagree. Creating one-two sentence stubs should be highly discouraged or and such info should be merged until such time as someone wants to take the time to create a halfway decent article per continuing discussions at WP:SCH.Gateman1997 01:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. Input in the ongoing discussion at WP:SCH would be appreciated. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 00:08, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn school. Dottore So 00:17, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's a work in progress, unless there's some evidence presented as for why it's particularly non-notable I see no reason to assume it. Bryan 01:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge into appropriate school district per developing consensus at WP:SCH.Gateman1997 01:08, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment - Please contribute to ongoing discussion at WP:SCH and help end this fractitious debate. Denni☯ 04:02, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge with Georgetown, Floyd County, Indiana, short article on another mundane middle school, see Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Merge. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:23, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. It would be inconsistent to be selectively inclusive with these schools while we are not equally selective regarding television shows and other fictional material. Yamaguchi先生 08:13, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
    • Fictional material is easily verifiable and has a much bigger audience. - Mgm|(talk) 11:14, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge per Sjakkalle. Nothing that warrants a separate article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:15, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep and continue to encourage stub creation on legitimate topics. This article is informative regarding the structure of education in the community as well as the internal structure of the school. Kappa 15:29, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. This is just as verifiable as a fictional work, and the claim that fictional works have a larger audience is both ambiguous and irrelevant. Silensor 22:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. --Vsion 04:47, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep See my reasons here. Xoloz 16:58, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as part of the fight [personal attacks removed]. The mere fact of something's existence makes it worthy of an article. Kurt Weber 23:45, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
    • Nonsense. It is neither Wikipedia's mandate nor is it possible to create an article for every bug fart on this planet. And before you talk about deletionist vandalism, I would urge you take a look at one day's worth of articles and educate yourself on the amount of nonsense, vanity, vandalism, and misinformation that arrives on our doorstep. If there was no way to get rid of garbage, I doubt you'd be hanging around here. Denni☯ 01:31, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn Middle school --JAranda | watz sup 23:47, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete no reliable sources quoted --redstucco 10:21, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete makes no claim of notability Pete.Hurd 00:03, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
  • keep please this schools is notable and important too Yuckfoo 00:37, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.