Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher animal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Higher animal

Pointless, dicdef, really. Informal, not an actual science term. Not universal definition - contentious as well. Delete. Natalinasmpf 21:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: unless someone wants to write a sourced article about the anthropocentric nature of such a term, it might be interesting. You could have humans and other animals write point and counter-point.--Hraefen 21:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as it stands. PJM 15:59, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. KillerChihuahua^?!? 16:06, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete per nom. Stifle 13:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.