Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hickey-Voodoo Glow Skulls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hickey-Voodoo Glow Skulls

What --Macarion 00:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete This article is nonsense (not patent nonsense), methinks someone just came home from the pub DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT _{THE THINGS I MESSED UP}00:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, despite the fact that it's "...one of the most crucial pieces of punk drama this decade." --Bill (who is cool!) 00:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete just a little POV... it's a nonsense however. Emc² (CONTACT ME) 00:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn with low Ghits--Jusjih 00:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete what it lacks in notability, it makes up for in POV -- Alias Flood 00:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per David, somebody's had a few. SM247^{My Talk} 01:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The dude does sound high on something. --Xrblsnggt 02:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete/Delete This is not so much a true split vote, as a document of WPunk rock and WPunk ethics. Hickey (band) should also be AfD'ed. ~ trialsanderrors 04:27, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete completely nonsense article in Wikipedia. *~Daniel~* ☎ 04:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense, fails WP:MUSIC. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Coredesat. Is this someone's eBay ad? --DaveG12345 05:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Worthy of BJAODN. Delete it because of its "messed-up-edness." Grandmasterka 07:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, page is all over the place —Pengo 07:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge the info with Hickey (band) (which is certainly a notable band... toured nationally, several releases on notable indie labels, covered in multiple works of legitimate media). PT ^(s-s-s-s) 19:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I have re-written the article to make more sense. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 22:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.