Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heuristic art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to Delete the article. --Konst.able^Talk 12:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Heuristic art

Seems to be a term invented by the author; only 49 unique Ghits; unsourced (for use of this term). NawlinWiki 14:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, unless proper sources are provided. PJM 14:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Heuristic art is an Analytic proposition used sporadically by art critics (i.e., algorithmic art exists, therefore heuristic art must exist because all algorithms are heuristics, just as "a red chair" entails the existence of "things that are red"). America jones 04:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete. Per nom and PJM; seems like original research without sufficiently more concrete usage. CobaltBlueTony 16:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete — as per CobaltBlueTony, this just seems like too much original research. More sourcing would be nice. -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 23:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete While the term is sensible, it is also general, and lacking a standard of use it doesn't seem to have a practical meaning. In current form, it's not a Wiki piece. - Corporal Tunnel 02:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.