Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hester Chapone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep --Cyde↔Weys 13:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hester Chapone

Extremly non notable person Thetruthbelow ^(talk) 04:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per my nom. Thetruthbelow ^(talk) 04:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 05:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no evidence of notablity supplied or found. - Motor (talk) 09:58, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not everything in those public domain 'pedias oughtta be imported here. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 19:31, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: a real writer, even if somewhat obscure and not widely-known today. Article cites a source and even Google gives several different results. There are articles on less notable people. Rain74 20:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per User:Rain74 and she passed the hundred year test (even if she's done badly on the two hundred year test). Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per Rain74. She merits a two paragraph entry in the better-known (and modern) lit encyclopedia, The Cambridge Guide to Literature in English. Espresso Addict 15:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment And it appears that some of her works are in print here, "Volume 3 .. Hester Chapone: Letters on the Improvement of the Mind, 1733; Advice to a New Married Lady, 1777; Letters on Filial Obedience; Selected Poems, Essays & Letters ..." Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.