Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heroic art
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. improvement. Nomination withdrawn. PeaceNT 12:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Heroic art
The article Heroic art asserts that this was the Third Reich's term for their official/preferred art, a claim that is baseless as far as I can tell. The locution "heroic art", which appears in art criticism from time to time, means different things to different people, much like "sentimental art" or "underrated art" or "confusing art", which also don't rate Wikipedia articles. Ewulp 20:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. STORMTRACKER 94 20:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Move any verifiable material to something like Nazi art, Art of the Third Reich, or fascist art. Bacchiad 12:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment A move to Art of the Third Reich would solve this nicely. I shouldn't have tagged it AfD...there needs to be an article on this subject, just not named "Heroic Art". Ewulp 05:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Done, although the search term "Heroic Art" with the subsidary search term Nazi does return the following [1] at Google Scholar. I can understand why User ewulp would wish this article to use a more specific name rather than a general one, and the move has now been done (its done by the move button next to the history button). It actually didn't need an Afd to do this. If Ewulp is happy with this renaming and that concerns with the veracity of the article can be dealt with (either by citing or rewriting) than this Afd can be closed by user Ewulp withrawing the nomination.KTo288 10:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn Shoulda just moved it in the first place, was asleep at the keyboard. Article will now be fixed! Thanks to all. Ewulp 11:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
