Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heptacorn

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 14:24, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Heptacorn

Hoax, no google hits, see also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Holy Order of the Number Seven. Thue | talk 22:25, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

delete this should have been speedy-deleted - obviously it's a jok.e - DavidWBrooks 22:28, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm going to block this guy if he adds one more of these nonsense articles. RickK 22:38, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Agree entirely. These are speedies - nonsense. Charles Matthews 10:59, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, hoax. Megan1967 23:03, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable, states has never been sighted. RJFJR 00:02, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep who are we to dispute the validity of a heptacorn (see unicorn)
  • Unsigned vote added by anon.
• Abstain Heptacorn means so many things to so many people. The fact that there are no google hits nor is there an entry on wikipedia is shocking. ironmike1968 23:23, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • No such user, vote added by anon.
• Delete It's obvious that it's a fake. I could make up a mythological beast called a grunabeast, but that doesn't mean it should get an article. --DaveTheRed 03:57, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• A fake you say? --THE GRUNABEAST
  • No such user, vote added by anon.
• Delete amusing hoax but still a hoax. -- Curps 08:32, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.