Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hepsi's third studio album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:CRYSTAL states that an article should not have an unverifiable speculation, but since this is not unverifiable, the WP:CRYSTAL argument does not hold in this case. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 03:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hepsi's third studio album

Hepsi's third studio album (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Prod removed without explanation. Violates WP:CRYSTAL. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: What about that reference at the bottom?
• If it's valid, I say Weak Delete because there's only one. If it's invalid, I say Speedy A7. Two One Six Five Five ^{discuss my greatness} 17:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• I can't read the reference either, but even assuming that it's valid, one reference is not enough to base an article on.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 17:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Too soon to contain any verifiable info, currently a crystal job here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep I was the one who created the page and created it all based on that one source, which contained alot of information. The reference is also reliabe, as it is from a well known turkish newspaper therefore I believe it should not be removed as it is not from a blog site or unreliable source. In future the page will be created again when the album is released and I believe that more references will come soon anyway. Mus001 (talk) 13:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

• Mentioning Shock Value II is WP:WAX.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

• Keep, the report doesn't give much info, but it is a reliable source. There will be more information as long as the release date approaches. --joseph ^msg 14:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.