Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henmania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge with Tim Henman. Deathphoenix ʕ 19:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Henmania

requires one or two lines on main Tim Henman article not worthy of a seperate article Charlesknight 11:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

• Cleanup and merge in to Tim Henman, with a redirect to prevent the article's recreation.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  11:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete We are not urbandictionary.com. Viridae 11:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- not notable slang -- MrDolomite 14:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge & Redirect to Tim Henman, sadly this is an ovreused phrase in the British press around Wimbeldon, eg last week in The Times (London) was [1] using the word, and for use over a few years to show it's not a (fast-dying fad) there is this [2] comment piece (top two google:timesonline+henman hits). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Inner Earth (talk • contribs) 16:56, 23 June 2006 .Inner Earth 11:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per above. --Coredesat 20:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Tim Henman. The idea of "Henmania" is real but most of this article is a joke. --Metropolitan90 02:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Leave it as it is! Henmania is a tangible occurence each year —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.137.33.65 (talk • contribs)
• Delete - awfully written. If the term must have a page, write it sensibly and in Wikipedia's unbaised and neutral way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.141.83.231 (talk • contribs)
• Merge and redirect to Tim Henman. Its a notable subject, but does not need its own article. Its length means it can easily become a section in the Tim Henman article - • The Giant Puffin • 16:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect Has to be kept in one form or another. ShizuokaSensei 11:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect I think it's a very accurate piece. Maybe correct a few grammatical errors though. Also, whilst you are doing it, try not take yourselves so seriously.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.