Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemadrone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:20, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hemadrone

Seems to be a creature that is only in the head of one person on this planet, and that person doesn't even has its own article here. Google results are also quite low (below 100), so I guess this is not really notable. --Conti|✉ July 6, 2005 21:10 (UTC)

  • Interesting. This one was put on VFD, then the message was removed and the text of this message were deleted by a vandal - User:24.222.135.220. Grutness...wha? 7 July 2005 13:56 (UTC)
  • Yes that is incredibly interesting. what a vandal! however, in this case i would like to congratulate the "vandal" for a job well done as it is clear that deleting the VFD was an astute and foresighted course of action. do i have to remind my distinguished colleagues (above) the role of the internet in establishing and propogating cultural memes? while the google results might currently be "low", i suspect that as coverage of this case expands the term "hemadrone" will enter cultural currency. it has happened before. didn't, for example, the term boogeyman begin its life as a creature inside "the head of one person on this planet"? My vote is emphatic: the entry stays. --joeschmo99 7 July 15:53 (UTC).
Well, feel free to try and create a new meme, but wikipedia is not the place for creating memes, it is the place to write about already well established memes. So if the word will be someday as notable as the boogeyman, I will stop opposing the existance of such an article. --Conti|✉ July 7, 2005 19:22 (UTC)
Interesting thing for joeschmo99 to write on his first edit in Wikipedia... I like the way he signed his name, too. Grutness...wha? 8 July 2005 00:25 (UTC)
  • Keep Wikipedia is not paper JimRaynor 14:39, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not verified... and even if it were, it'd belong on that one person's page. Almafeta 17:04, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. One man's delusional belief is not encyclopedic. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 17:23, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.