Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helsinki Vodka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 11:48, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Helsinki Vodka

This is a blatant advertisement DanLitovPhD 01:39, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 04:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: No point trying to rewrite it. Only 35 google hits. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 06:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems like a legitimate brand of vodka. Cnwb 06:54, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep for now, pending further research... seems like a legitimate spirit, per Cnwb. I took a stab and cleaned up the article a bit (removed the obvious advertising, provided a corporate link to replace the distributor's one). Not much to expand on, of course, due to its limited popularity. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete forcing a rewrite, per nom.  freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  10:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertisement. BrianGCrawfordMA 19:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I don't see what is wrong with this. I don't see why this is advertisement. I don't see what rules this violates. I don't see why it shouldn't be here. Therefor I must say I think we should keep it. --CyclePat 02:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per CyclePat. Can't see any reason to delete. Stifle 22:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.