Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell Demonio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 02:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hell Demonio

Hell Demonio (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Doesn't appear to meet music notability standards for a band. Article was replaced after CSD A7 deletion[1]. Dougie WII (talk) 20:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:BAND, WP:RS. JohnCD (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Is Wallace Records a notable label? Their page is a sub-stub right now, but I wouldn't entirely rule out the label being possibly notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep pending that Wallace Records can be deemed as a notable label. Dusti^{talk to me} 20:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• keep because its relevent —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.154.197 (talk) 20:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per JohnCD's comments —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtphokie (talk • contribs)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as inability to verify questionable claim that it passes WP:BAND Blaxthos ( t / c ) 02:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per JohnCD, but you have to love a band that calls its first release "Greatest Hits"... Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.