Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heinen's Fine Foods

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 12:19, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heinen's Fine Foods

Heinen's Fine Foods (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Commercial, advertising content Haans42 20:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

  • I suggest to keep article, after removing content that is advertising and rephrasing sentences to approach a neutral point of view. I will go ahead and see what I can do. --DangApricot 22:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I forgot to point out that this article was nominated for deletion before. See more about this at Talk:Heinen's Fine Foods. --DangApricot 22:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Perhaps I'm being too simplistic, but this seems to me to be a straightforward advertising article which I would have flagged as {{db-spam}}--Anthony.bradbury 23:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for non-notability. I don't see this as meeting CSD G11 except a couple of sentences; it's a reasonably well-formatted encyclopedia article and mostly NPOV. Also, admins tend to frown on speedy being applied where there's a prior AFD as it may be seen as overturning consensus. That said, there is little in the article that truly asserts notability. --Dhartung | Talk 03:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep A google search shows there is independant media coverage, though none is cited in the actual article. The company appears to meet WP:CORP.--Kubigula (talk) 23:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It's more notable than the typical retail business of this size, with media stories like this. Mereda 15:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.