Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heilkunst (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS} 09:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Heilkunst

In AfD of previous article on this subject, subject was held to be nonnotable. JamesMLane t c 04:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete (nominator). The discussion in the decision to delete a previous article on this subject showed that Heilkunst is a viewpoint about homeopathy that's apparently taught at only one school. It's not even "mainstream" homeopathy. Because this article is different from the deleted one, though, it's not a substantial re-creation, so it seemed inappropriate for a speedy. JamesMLane t c 04:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, just nonsense. --Alphachimp ^talk 06:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense. Not patent nonsense, just nonsense. --Coredesat 07:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Not notable. DarthVader 08:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- as above -- MrDolomite 14:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete ^{24 June 2006 00:01} Ste4k wrote: Topic matter is unverifiable having no reliable published source per Item 6.3

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.