Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heeshem (2nd. Nom)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted at author's request --Steve (Stephen) talk 05:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heeshem

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Heeshem Articles for deletion/Heeshem (2nd. Nom)
Heeshem (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Deleted a few days ago, recreated with different text, so not eligible under G4 - but then I attempted under CSD A7. A user deleted the CSD template, so I'm calling it contested, if not incorrectly. As near as I can tell, there is no notability for this company, and a Google search for this company turns up nothing that points to such an existence. Given circumstances and despite my opinion that this company is not notable, I am calling this procedural and am accordingly abstaining from !voting. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep It's sourced and notable enough. The aim is to build an encyclopedia not delete everything from it. Xanucia 22:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The company's sole claim to notability is that it intends to market some products. DGG 23:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Know what, it's a relativly small company and they are probably going to fail in the near future. I don't really care actually when it gets to be a big company I'll put it back in. So since I'm the creator of it, just delete it. --New York Warrior 99 00:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC) — New York Warrior 99 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    • Wow. Same tone as the previous AfD. Upgrade to Speedy Delete and Salt. G7 is as good as any reason to get rid of it. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.