Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hedrick Cooperative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Pastordavid (talk) 21:47, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hedrick Cooperative

Hedrick Cooperative (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unremarkable organisation, with scant to non-existent claims to notability, article clearly written as a puff-piece by the organisation. Mayalld (talk) 17:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. The claims are fine and the sourcing isn't bad for an article just created in the past few days. Doesn't read like a puff-piece at all, merely like a new editor's first contribution. Mangojuice^talk 17:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spellcast (talk) 20:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete completely uninteresting and utterly non-notable. AnteaterZot (talk) 01:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 13:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. The nearest thing to a claim to notability seems to be "It is the oldest student owned cooperative in East Lansing.". I don't think that's enough. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.