Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heck

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. This doesn't preclude redirect, but there isn't a consensus to redirect. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 13:45, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Heck

• Delete nonsense. Should be deleted or redirected to Hell. Revolución 21:24, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Hell -Soltak 21:45, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Factual material about a valid topic. Tverbeek 22:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
  • A word that little children and stuffy housewives say to avoid the word Hell is not a valid topic. A portion of the material is completely false and the rest of it has no encyclopedic value. Should we have articles for gosh and son of a buck? -Soltak 22:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Tverbeck, notable euphemism and imaginary place. Kappa 23:16, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Hell. I can think up of another way kids say hell: h, e, double-hockey sticks. Others could go on. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 23:18, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep & expand - it is in the noosphere. I would like to see some of those 'ironic religious philosophers', though, and mayber a little history. Eldereft 23:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Minced oath, where other cleaned-up profanities are.—Wahoofive (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to minced oath. Secretlondon 00:05, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to minced oath. Punkmorten 12:19, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Minced oath. Nandesuka 17:02, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.