Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy isotopes

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 20:07, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Heavy isotopes

Keenan Pepper added the vfd tag to this article about a month ago, but didn't create the subpage. I am doing so now. --Canderson7 19:07, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, article doesn't match the title. Talrias (t | e | c) 19:24, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Move to James Andrew Harris, since there is no such an article and make it a substub. This one should be deleted afterwards or instantly filled with something relevant --Dungodung 19:27, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, and spare us the trouble of moving to James Andrew Harris and then deleting James Andrew Harris for lack of notability/content. --Scimitar 19:42, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as having too little context, although a redirect to isotope might be useful. Mgm|^(talk) 19:59, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• The original author's choice of article title leaves me boggled. This is the two-sentence beginning of a biography of James Andrew Harris, one of the team who identified isotopes of rutherfordium and dubnium. Whether he meets the WP:BIO criteria is unclear without further research. The article doesn't help in the slightest, of course. This is definitely the wrong name for the article, though. Uncle G 22:43, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.