Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartthrob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Heartthrob

This article completely fails WP:NPOV in that defining someone as a "hearthrob" is inherently subjective, and also WP:V in that no entry has a citation to a published source. Kevin 05:36, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete Sounds like a slang definiton to me. Unless there is some standardized criteria to describe "heart throb" and that criteria goes beyond a slang definition, there seems to be nothing here of note. Ande B. 05:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, wiktionary already has an entry. - Motor (talk) 12:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. — TKD::Talk 16:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It's not entirely unknown for Wikipedia to have pages devoted to memes and slang terms, but this is too subjective, and, I think, adequately covered by other areas. — WCityMike ^(T | C)  ⇓ plz reply HERE  (why?) ⇓  17:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I removed the subjective/unreferenced content and now there is nothing but a dicdef, which is really all the article will become. Bombshell probably also needs the axe. Peyna 19:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.