Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heads Up with Richard Herring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 08:38, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Heads Up with Richard Herring

Minor chatshow on minor satellite station. Guest list is a veritable Who's That of British "slebrity" with the single notable exception of John Thomson. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 16:23, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep Notable show with a notable host... I'm keenly aware of Richard Herring from Fist of Fun, etc. I don't know quite what would make a chat show "minor" exactly, but it's major enough that all the guests listed already have WP articles, many of them quite sizable. It's certainly not the British equivalent of a public-access show or anything similar. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:54, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Richard Herring is certainly notable. N (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2005

I never said he wasn't. But this show? I think not. What are the verified audience rating figures? - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 22:49, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

No idea, but this is far from the only article that doesn't include verified audience figures. That it's the UK's first poker chat show, on a station that is actually notable among UK poker fans, with a notable presenter, and with (reasonably) notable guests is enough, for me at least.. - N (talk) 19:36, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, although I should note that not all the people listed as guests had WP entries prior to the creation of this article. Several, including Malcolm Harwood and Tiffany Williamson were created at the same time this article was. Essexmutant 16:02, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The show just started, and it's impact isn't guessable at this point. But it's certainly the first of its kind, and I wouldn't be surprised if there's a lot of shows that follow this format soon.--Mike Selinker 04:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.