Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hdcp stripper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete nancy ^(talk) 13:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hdcp stripper

Hdcp stripper (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Complete WP:OR with "references" to home pages of companies purporting to strip HDCP (but still is OR). If it was properly sourced, it might be valid on the HDCP page, but user refuses to do so. The exact same text was added to four different pages and was reverted off all of them. The article isn't even titled correctly (should be HDCP). New User who only edits on this topic is attempting to end run around Wikipedia sourcing rules. KelleyCook (talk) 05:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - particularly drivelly-OR. —TreasuryTag talkcontribs 07:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Normally I'd say merge back into High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection‎ but I don't think there's anything of encyclopedic value, certainly not verifiable or sourced. --MCB (talk) 08:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. I can't see anything of value here - it looks like an effort to promote products. Ianbetteridge (talk) 17:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge - There are about a thousand results on google when searching for HDCP strippers, and I suspect this number is likely to grow as the demand increases. I would prefer a merge at this point, unless the subject matter becomes big enough to deserve its own article. --Rebroad (talk) 01:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.