Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley phillips

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —Korath (Talk) 00:38, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hayley phillips

Public love letter to the writer's inamorata, who's no doubt delightful but doesn't seem notable. (I initially speedied this, but on reflection couldn't come up with a reason -- other than gut feeling, common sense, etc. etc. -- for doing so. So I regret that it must instead go through the VfD process, and other people have to waste their time over it too.) -- Hoary 04:53, 2005 Feb 18 (UTC)

• Delete. Obvious vanity. (Note: I proposed adding a speedy criterion for articles written in the first person here.) – flamurai (t) 04:59, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A vanity filled personal essay. Zzyzx11 07:27, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Btw there is an Australian child actress by that name. Megan1967 09:28, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy and inform user of policy. Mgm|^(talk) 10:08, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • On further reflecting, I recommend deletion. Wikipedia is not the place to put love declarations period (not a hosting service). Especially when you don't take the time to register. Mgm|^(talk) 10:11, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
• The IP number that created the page has now deleted it, which I think qualifies it as speedyable after all. -- Hoary 11:44, 2005 Feb 18 (UTC)
• 21:28, Feb 18, 2005 Dante Alighieri deleted Hayley phillips (creator blanked page)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.