Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayden gerson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hayden gerson

Hayden gerson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Little to no support for the claims of notability made in this article. Gerson has founded a MySpace group with 17,000 members - what do people think of this? The group's name, "People Helping People," is pretty generic and therefore hard to search for, but Google searching for "People Helping People" Hayden or "People Helping People" myspace doesn't turn up anything to show that the group has made an impact outside MySpace. Beyond this, the unsourced claims that this 23-year-old [1] real estate agent/mortgage broker is an "industry leader" and "an opinion leader in the field of finance" seem a bit exaggerated. Note: PROD tag removed by article creator, who supplied a couple of external links that are unfortunately not reliable external sources. FreplySpang 11:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete I mean, the America One homepage, his supposed employer, is listed under external links, I don't know what else we could possibly need to meet WP:V. Seriously . . . Fails WP:BIO. janejellyroll 11:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Googling reveals his real estate business and a couple of complaints, but no evidence of real notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:BIO. MER-C 12:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless properly sourced and referenced i.a.w. WP:BIO by end of this AfD Alf photoman 15:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable, fails WP:BIO. NawlinWiki 19:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - outside of the myspace community doesn't appear to be any legitimate 3rd party coverage, ergo WP:V as well as the above. SkierRMH,19:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.