Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hay (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hay (company)

Hay (company) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This company, judging by the article, does not seem notable - only primary sources are cited. Google gives references to some (apparently unrelated) companies of this name, but I did not find any compelling secondary source. But since the article has been created from the "Requested articles" list, it may warrant a wider discussion. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 15:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I see what you mean, it has been there for the last 6-7 months and nobody has really contributed to the article, as the creator of the article I personally think there isn't really going to be any other addtional stuff that will be gathered on the company and added to the page, but I will try my best to gather some more info on 'HAY'.

mickyfitz13 ^Talk 16:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. A note to Micky, above, the problem here is WP:CORP I think - so if you can satisfy that, it'd be worth a shot. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

At the moment i have too much work (school wise) on at the moment, so i don't think i can contribute much to the article, i will be happy to see it slip, but if there is any other information on the company it should be added. So far i have found little to none, there is too many Hay companies out there. I personally think it should be Deleted, but it should be left for a month before the final decision should be made. mickyfitz13 ^Talk 18:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I nominated this for speedy, as it consisted essentially of a list of the services they offered. Another ed. removed it--and I may have been wrong-- for there seems to be some potential, judging by a list of their clients at [1]. But somebody has to work on it.DGG (talk) 18:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Seems to be a solid enough company, but notability is limited, and Wikipedia is not a business directory. There are very few sources out there that I can find. --Dhartung | Talk 22:53, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, page can always be recreated if outside sources for notability are found. SolidPlaid 00:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.