Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hashkafah.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was CSD G7 - CrazyRussian talk/email 23:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hashkafah.com

Does not assert meeting WP:WEB, nevertheless PROD tag was removed. I find no coverage of this site as prescribed by WP:WEB, also it's apparently only been mentioned on a total of 8 different websites [1] suggesting that it has an active community but is not of much interest to anyone outside that community. To meet WP:WEB, evidence needs to be presented that this site has been written about by reliable, independent sources. --W.marsh 02:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per nom. Note: Alexa rank of 88,321. Morgan Wick 04:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Question: The article says the site has 2500 members. Assuming this is true, does that in itself impart sufficient notability? - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Not really. "Notability" is nice but it doesn't really matter if there isn't any verifiable information on the topic to write the article from, and WP:WEB is really just about making sure that information exists. 2,500 members doesn't directly mean that reliable sources have covered something, or that it otherwise meets WP:WEB. --W.marsh 04:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete well written article. Sorry, Aishel. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:WEB. --Daniel575 05:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete — per Crazy Russian. Sorry, Aishel. Chris Griswold 07:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - as per everyone else. Makes sense.--69.220.225.232 22:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
whoops, that was me, I forgot to sign in.--aishel 22:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.