Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey's Point

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete ck lostsword•T•C 23:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harvey's Point

Harvey's Point (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Previously created under the titles Harveys Point and Harveys point and speedy deleted under G11 and A7. This page was also a requested speedy delete, but as it keeps being recreated we should determine consensus.

Previous attempt at AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harveys Point was shut down by me. DrKiernan 15:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Delete Fails WP:NOTE and, frankly WP:SPAM. Pedro |  Chat  15:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete - This third version is not substantially different from the other two. It's still more of an advertisement than anything else and the article doesn't suggest that it's particularly notable. It looks like a pleasant hotel in a pleasant location...but so what? -- Hux 16:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Have listed again for it's unique style under the architecture in Ireland listings due to it's unique alpine themes. I have made every effort to remove any advertising aspect in the article. I feel that this is being taken personally due to previous attempts being considered not notable, and should be given fair consideration as a unique building in Donegal, the top holiday destination in Ireland. I don't deem this article any less worth than some other hotel related articles on WIkipediaIrishjp 16:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

• I'm sorry that you feel victimised. I assure you that I mean no personal attack. The purpose of this discussion is to ensure that both you and the article get fair consideration. DrKiernan 16:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate your response, but I have seen that previous deletions were considered due to it not being written in an encyclopedic manner. This type of thing isn't mentioned during any of the discussions I have had, and certainly rates no worse than a lot of the listings on here. I feel that the way this has been now written is a fair description of a very unique building that I said I will try to get pictures of with the owners approval. I think this submission should be considered on it's own merit for the design and architecture of the building as much as anything else, especially as I am a new contributor who has not truely been assisted in creating a first full posting. I will be fleshing out the details when the information is forthcoming. Irishjp 16:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete As per Pedro. If there is something notable about this hotel, which is sourced, please include it for consideration... otherwise, this really seems to be nothing more than an advertisement. Hiberniantears 16:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't think this is getting a fair look and the "who cares" statement really sums it up. I don't particularly care about AM radio stations in Texas, and don't deem the fact that the Jurys Inn in Birmingham is one of the tallest in it's street. People who live in Birmingham might do though, just as people in Donegal and Ireland would care about the inclusion of a hotel like this. As a first post on Wikipedia, I am very disappointed in this narrow focus that is being demonstrated, that the top hotel in an Irish county doesn't warrent inclusion, but one in a British city does. Try a search on "London Hotel" and see what turns up, yet my posting is not noteworthy Irishjp 16:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Delete. Any An award and a 4 star rating put the hotel near notability standards but not enough. What has this hotel done to set it out from other hotels? I'm sorry for accidentally removing the AfD tag, as I thought it was a prod. I wanted to make sure that the article gets full consideration under AfD, which it is getting right now. Royalbroil 16:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete There is nothing about the article that asserts notability, nothing stated to show that it stands out from other hotels, no non trivial sources, only it's website and a log-in site with no mention of the hotel. As is, it reads like an advert.--Sandahl 18:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 03:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G4, A7, G11 Will ^(talk) 15:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.