Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harun hilton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 09:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Harun hilton

Harun hilton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I suspect this is either a hoax or a nn person. Most of the references are personal pages on social networking sites, Google doesn't seem to have a lot of interest in the name other than video sites (which is surprising for an internet celebrity), and the videos that are posted of this person invariably get less than a hundred views or so. If someone can find out more information about this subject, please do. Thanks. Rnb (talk) 15:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. The only reference that seems of any use, to a newspaper, doesn't lead to anything that mentions this individual's name(s). The rest is self-promotion and irrelevant links like one to a page for his school. Doesn't seem to demonstrate notability to my mind, although it certainly asserts it. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Accounting4Taste. Three of the references were just links to Wikipedia itself (which have since been converted into wikilinks), two are to the subject's own pages on social networking sites, and the remaining two don't mention the subject. No real indication of notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

i still don't see why it shouldn't be deleted. yes, a few edit mistakes need to be made, but other than that, i have listed many reasons why this article must stay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harunhilton (talk • contribs) 16:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

IT ISN'T A SELF PROMOTION. everything that is on there is TRUE. and there is tons more to come. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.146.161.101 (talk) 11:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Article only just asserts enough to scrape past CSD A7, but the subject is not notable, and notability is not demonstrated by how many times one's channel/website/MySpace is visited. WilliamH (talk) 16:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong delete definite WP:COI and fails WP:N and WP:RS. treelo talk 23:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  • if the article is not "based on encyclopedic suitability of a topic for a Wikipedia article", then why are there articles about other bloggers and enteratiners? and like I said, the article is nowehere NEAR done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.146.185.10 (talk) 11:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
    • There are articles about other bloggers and entertainers because, in many cases, those other bloggers and entertainers have been discussed in independent, reliable sources. If Harun Hilton has been discussed in such sources, I haven't seen evidence of that. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.