Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Townend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harry Townend

Harry Townend (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails Notability test. Unimportant curator Tovojolo 01:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - NN, OR, POV, UE, Etc... Makes no assertion of notability... Spawn Man 01:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 03:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 03:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, and reads like obituary lifted from local paper. Johnbod 04:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per Johnbod. The same person that created this page also created John Comper, which reads similarly. --Crusio 07:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete. I can find no evidence from the article or a Google search that the subject meets WP:BIO, and curators of relatively minor art galleries do not appear to be automatically notable. The strongest claim to inclusion would be as the author of the book on Turner which appears to have gone through 2 editions [1] The only online references I can find to this book are from secondhand book sellers and a few library catalogues; though I can find no reviews, a book published in 1923 is unlikely to have any online so they may well exist in print. Willing to change my mind if new evidence uncovered, especially if it would go towards his meeting WP:BIO as an author. Note, he's not the same as Sir Harry Townend, another author with different dates. Espresso Addict 15:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.