Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Pye

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Result was Keep. Caknuck 04:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harry Pye

Harry Pye (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nominated for speedy deletion under A7 (non-notable biographies) by Diemunkiesdie but I consider that the article does assert notability of a kind. No vote from me. Sam Blacketer 10:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. The article needs sourcing, but Harry Pye has been covered by independent sources as required per WP:BIO. This article in The Guardian calls him "the master of the lo-fi underground group show", and LexisNexis turns up further significant coverage in The Times. EALacey 11:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. A likely hoax. --Listen up friend 19:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)— Listen up friend (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    • Comment. Do you have any evidence he isn't real? His recent exhibition has been covered by multiple newspapers (including one online article cited above), and there's more minor coverage going back to the 1990s. EALacey 19:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, article in the Guardian, page at artnet. Corvus cornix 22:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 02:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per EALacey. Maxamegalon2000 05:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep EALacey has said all that needs to be said. JodyB talk 18:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.