Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter: Book Seven (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Harry Potter: Book Seven (film)

Is this really necessary? Yes, eventually, this article will be created in the tune of the other films in the Harry Potter series that aren't in production yet, but the book hasn't even been named yet. Why do we need an article for a film that doesn't even have a proper name yet? Delete for being a crystal ball article on a film that hasn't even been named yet based on a book that hasn't even been named yet. --Deathphoenix 15:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete; I've nothing in principle against an article for a film without a proper name, so long as there are concrete facts that can be stated. At present, there isn't; the article is just speculation, and is likely to remain so for some time to come. Fourohfour 16:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, crystalballism.Image:Weather rain.pngSoothingR 16:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, at minimum until the book is actually published. - Mike Rosoft 17:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete all articles for unreleased movies based on unreleased books that are not only not yet written, but don't even have a title. Book seven itself is, I think, acceptable to have around, but the movie of book seven is, like...crystal balling the crystal ball. Lord Bob 17:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above ComputerJoe 18:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete until the seventh book hits the street --Ruby 19:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Crystal ball, per above. --lightdarkness (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. BobbyLee 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
    user has no edits before today. Lord Bob 21:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Jonathan235. You need to know about future films, even if they don't have a title yet. There was the Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film) before the release of the book.
    • Delete. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film) was nothing more than a redirect to the article about the book until four days before the book was published. There is nothing useful that can be written about the film of the seventh Harry Potter book yet. --Metropolitan90 02:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete... way too much crystal ballery (even the article admits it, with all those hypothetical phrases used). --Kinu t/c 06:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Extreme crystal ballery. At the very least, redirect to Harry Potter: Book Seven to discourage recreation. Hermione1980 14:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Treznor 02:51, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Crystal ball EivindFOyangen 03:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Book Seven is not even out yet, maybe after Book Seven is released. --Terence Ong 12:06, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete absolutly delete this totally unneccessary big shiny crystal ball of an article. How on earth can we have an article on the film adaptation of a book that hasn't even been published yet. Death Eater Dan 12:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Don't count the chickens before they are hatched; at least never before the cock and the hen are married! Cygnus_hansa 23:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.