Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison "Skip" Pope, Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Malinaccier (talk) 13:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Harrison "Skip" Pope, Jr.

Harrison "Skip" Pope, Jr. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Notability appears borderline, no third-party sources. Wizardman 01:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep, Google Scholar does bear out the citation claims to an extent, well beyond many scholars who have been kept in the past. Numerous accessible reliable sources. If anything, he's good at being topical. --Dhartung | Talk 08:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 19:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Appears in the ISI Highly Cited Researcher database.[1] Espresso Addict (talk) 20:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep -- speedy keep in fact, based on the ISI highly cited. DGG (talk) 21:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per Espresso Addict and Dhartung's comments. In addition, GoogleScholar produces impressive citation results[2], with top citation hits of 299, 208, 171, 140, 121, 127, 114, 104, 102 and h-index of about 33. Also, a filtered GoogleNews gives at least 164 hits related to him[3], including stories by NPR, LA Times, NY Times, Boston Globe, USA Today, etc. Passes WP:PROF as a highly cited researcher and as an academic frequently quoted as an expert on psychiatry in conventional mass media. Nsk92 (talk) 21:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.