Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harris & Harrison

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 04:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Harris & Harrison

Harris & Harrison (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. An article on a "comedy writing duo" whose only public work appears to be Proud & Prejudiced: A Gigolo's Tale, available through self-publisher lulu.com. Two of the three references provided are sourced through the subjects' website; the third is "customer reviews" found at lulu.com (a clear failure of WP:V). Possibly a WP:COI. The creation of Mike ay a WP:SPA who claims to be the copyright holder of the image of Harris & Harrison included in the article. Prod was removed by an IP with the explanation "Do not think article should be deleted - article has been improved with editing changes". In fact, no editing took place between the application and removal of the prod tag. Victoriagirl (talk) 00:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. No secondary sources, and a quick search on Google News (or even Google Web) doesn't turn up anything useful. Hqb (talk) 10:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. I hate it when links to the subject's website are used as references. Verkhovensky (talk) 00:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 15:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete As per nom.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Time to get rid of a lot of the vanity "arts" entries. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 23:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as not passing notability or verifiability guidelines.--BelovedFreak 18:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.