Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Hoag

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) — Caknuck 07:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harold Hoag

Harold Hoag (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable wrestler, PROD contested. Darrenhusted 10:54, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —Darrenhusted 11:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Worked for one of the two biggest wrestling companies in the world, made several PPV apperances - that he's unsourced is a different issue all together, it's easily verifiable that he wrestled for WCW and made several apperances in a non-jobber role. MPJ-DK 12:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Ice Train is notable, pure and simple. --DanZero 15:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: Ice Train was certainly no jobber (heck, there over 400 unique G-hits), although his career was relatively short and he wasn't a headliner. He's at least as notable as your one-game pro player, whom WP:BIO entitles to an article.  RGTraynor  15:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, for the above reasons. Callelinea 16:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep passes WP:BIO as is suffiently well known --sumnjim talk with me·changes 16:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep He was on several episodes of a national TV show, which makes him more then notable. Kris 18:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment If someone adds some refs I'll withdraw the nom. Darrenhusted 21:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It needs to be sourced, but he was a mid-carder for WCW (one of the 2 biggest wrestling organizations in the world) for several years. TJ Spyke 23:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.