Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harmisajedi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Userfy --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 19:31 (UTC)

[edit] Harmisajedi

This article is vanity, and seems like a personal webpage, due to the quote at the top, the "about me", etc. The article was even seemingly written by the person in question (if one is notable, the article should probably come about by others, no?). It should probably be userfyed and removed from having its own article. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 05:58, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete vanity. JamesBurns 06:13, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Could it be a botched attempt at creating a legit user page? CanadianCaesar 08:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Userfy, probably the creator didn't understand the wikipedia system. Kappa 09:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Userfy, probably an innocent mistake jamesgibbon 13:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Clear userfy to User:Harmisajedi. DoubleBlue (Talk) 14:55, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Userfy. An honest mistake made by a new user. Rentastrawberry 17:35, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Userfy since they actually have an account, with an appropriate version of a {{test1}} message. -Splash 23:52, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Author has made other contributions to Wikipedia. Userfy. Uncle G 14:56, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)
  • Why is his user name red? Has he gone or is he from another language wiki? Jaberwocky6669 June 28, 2005 07:18 (UTC)
    • A red username simply means that he has no user page (like how article links go red when there is no article on the other end). It's not really significant :) -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | June 28, 2005 21:49 (UTC)
      • The information in this article has now been moved to the contributor's user page. Cheers! -- BD2412 talk July 2, 2005 00:58 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.