Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 00:37, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Harman

Delete articles primary reason for existence seems to be advertising Royal Blue 05:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as spamvertising. Royboycrashfan 05:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Bobby1011 05:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: A blatant advertisement in addition to being non-notable. --Hetar 06:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 06:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete delete per nom and seems to fail WP:CORP. Pepsidrinka 07:09, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Pepsidrinks. —ERcheck @ 19:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable Sbohra 10:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.