Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hareiously

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Robert 13:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hareiously

Can only ever be a dictionary definition. Might be suitable for a move to Wiktionary. RicDod 08:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - dicdef, and unverifiable. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-06-24 09:13Z
• Delete, unverifiable. Google returns 18 unique hits. Apparently this was in a 15th century citation, but there's no verification of this anywhere. --Coredesat 09:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The word's only notability is the vowel thing. Fails WP:NOT A7 and is a dicdef (and OED level at that). "Hareiously has lost its function in the modern English Wikipedia" --DaveG12345 10:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete archaic dicdef. Jammo (SM247) 00:47, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.