Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hard to Concentrate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge, as there is consensus this article shouldn't exist but no consensus to remove the content. Johnleemk | Talk 11:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hard to Concentrate

I put a prod tag on it but that was removed with no reasoning left on the talk page or in the edit summary. The song is not going to be released as a single as far as I can tell and the article doesn't include any claim of cultural significance. It's just a song and could be summed up on the album's page. Dismas|(talk) 10:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Merge into Stadium Arcadium. --Ed (Edgar181) 11:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete It's a completely non-notable song, and there's nothing worth merging. -- Kicking222 22:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It could be merged, but is anyone going to actually merge it, and would it really fit in with the article? The fact that it was written as a wedding song for Flea seems to be important to be fans, so perhaps we should just let it be.—Preceding unsigned comment added by SandwichHat (talk • contribs)
  • User's 4th edit.--Chaser T 13:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It is definitely an important song off of Stadium Arcadium because it symbolizes the love lives of some of the band members - Bagel7 08:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I say it should be deleted, but ONLY if information related to that it was the "wedding proposal" be included in the original article. OR I say instead of having an entry for each song, each disc gets an entry and all of these types of notes are combined into that article. Less RE-Re-Redirects. (as some of the songs already have a redirect several times.) ZyphBear 02:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.