The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Redirect --Gareth Hughes 13:33, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Rambling text, Haran already has an article. Redirect would not make sense as no one would use this phrase. -- Kjkolb 10:10, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
redirect. At least one person used it. Trollderella 19:57, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Redirect per Trollderella. They're cheap and s/he's right. Denni☯ 22:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Comment: not exactly, the title was copied from an encyclopedia entry where Haran in the Bible had to be disambiguated from other Harans. -- Kjkolb 23:03, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.