Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happyanimal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox (UTC) 10:46, 28 May '06

[edit] Happyanimal

Contested prod, from April. Reprodded with "neologism, unsourced, prob. offensive; orig. prod tag removed by a blocked vandal"; I agree, delete. Moved here as the prod tag was actually removed and not by a banned user as far as I know, plus this will make any recreation speedyable. Mangojuice^talk 02:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per any nom. M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 04:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as an unverifiable neologism. --Hetar 04:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no source for this available. Nomen Nescio^{Gnothi seauton} 10:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. NawlinWiki 11:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- Wikipedia is not for things made up in prison one day. Haikupoet 03:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.