Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Christian Ørsted Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 23:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hans Christian Ørsted Institute

Not an actual institute, just a building at an university. Wikipedia is not a catalogue of all the buildings in the world. PROD contested. Sandstein 06:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I added prod tag. The log entry that removed the tag suggested that the Hans Christian Ørsted Institute might be notable for being a just a building complex rather than a research/teaching department, but that usage is not uncommon at the University of Copenhagen. (The nearby August Krogh and Panum institues are just buildings too). Henning Makholm 06:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, a building with no historical significance or notability --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 07:01, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete a nn building--Porturology 10:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep A dorm building at Harvard is notable, but these are not? Whats good for the goose... keep. Roodog2k 14:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Referred to often enough, with non-trivial Google hits; article suitable because it's something a reasonable person might come across a reference to and want more information on. Monicasdude 16:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge with the parent. -- JJay 16:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge a stripped down version to parent. Deizio 19:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - As nom. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 20:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Information on a building complex at a notable university is useful and not neccessary to merge into the parent. Should be linked to by the parent, however - otherwise, it's useless. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 23:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and link to parent Nigelthefish 17:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.