Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanglish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Punkmorten 13:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hanglish

A neologism coined on June 15, 2006, a mere 7 days ago, probably hasn't even caught on in the coiner's inner circle. WP:NOT the place to popularise slang. Earlier prod was removed with no explanation in talk. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 05:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. ---Charles 05:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Please. A one-week old neologism, loads of original research, a topic that wanders from the subject of Konglish/Hanglish to talk at length about the history of itself. Not an encyclopedia article. It might make a blog that I'd like to read, but it's not Wiki-worthy. Interlingua ^talk 06:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no way known will this survive. Jammo (SM247) 06:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NEO and WP:NPOV. --Coredesat 07:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-06-22 08:48Z
• Delete because it's stupid. Danny Lilithborne 10:08, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per interlingua. Paddles ^T_C
• Delete. per WP:NEO and per Danny Lilithborne. --Danielrocks123 ^{talk contribs} 00:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 04:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.