Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Handel Choir of Baltimore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:21, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Handel Choir of Baltimore

Non-notable choir. The ensemble is known for an annual performance of Messiah by George Frideric Handel. Now there's a mark of distinction. —Wahoofive (talk) 23:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

  • It's also been performing for seventy years, which makes it notable in my book. Keep Tuf-Kat 00:02, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
    • My church choir's been singing for 70 years, can it have its own page? 67.125.88.249 01:38, 23 September 2005 (UTC) (User:Wahoofive)
      • If it only performs at church every week and isn't particularly known for that, I'd say no. Tuf-Kat 01:57, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep a group that can get away with charging $20-40 tickets for performances (see its website). DDerby(talk) 02:35, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, meets WP:MUSIC 6; two albums on Brioso ([1], [2]; I can't get to Brioso's website right now, but they seem to be the classical equivalent of an "indie label") makes borderline WP:MUSIC 3; also notable as the oldest community choir in the state [3]. I wish WP:MUSIC was better tailored to classical artists, but this one seems a clear keep on point 6 plus their history. — mendel ☎ 15:47, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
    • I proposed on the talk page (prior to this nom) adding something that allows groups with a long documented history of performances, specifically for orchestras and similar groups that may be very notable without meeting the other guidelines. Anyone who has any thoughts, feel free to stop by. Tuf-Kat 17:27, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • keep They arguably pass WP:MUSIC Roodog2k (talk) 16:20, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, borderline case, err on the side of keeping. Andrew pmk | Talk 17:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep ··gracefool |☺ 07:51, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.