Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamsteria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE (to BJAODN). Owen× ☎ 00:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hamsteria

Nonsense page about rodent royalty: "The Royal House of Hamsteria is an instituition created in 1999 to recognise hamsters. All Syrian hamsters are related and this particular family is a symbol of Hamsters worldwide." Calton | Talk 01:23, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete LOL. CanadianCaesar 01:31, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom + BJAODN. =) -LichYoshi 02:01, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but as per LichYoshi. This deserves + BJAODN treatment. Uncyclopedia as well. Hamster Sandwich 02:29, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone. --bbatsell | « give me a ring » 02:33, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete That's, uh, some article there. It'd be great if not for being total patent nonsense. Cynicism addict 02:50, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Turnstep 03:19, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as stated above. mdd4696 04:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination and send to BJAODN; inventive for a hoax article. Jtmichcock 05:15, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, comes with "© Copyrighted work, can be used for non profitable use." copyright tag. If we're not going to allow non-commercial use images, we certainly shouldn't allow text that's incompatible with the GFDL. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:37, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Hamha! Ticky-ticky, ticky-ticky... Heke? Hif-hif... hif-hiff... Atata! Hamgoof. Delete! Bye-q! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:59, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Preaky 22:39, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Izehar 16:37, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.