Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamo Field

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete HappyCamper 03:06, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hamo Field

Appears to be pure vanity. — Anarchivist | Talk 18:35, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: Agreed, probable delete. He is listed as one of the "notable alumni" from Kalamazoo College on Wikipedia, but he may have added himself. Google brings up very little on the guy and absolutely nothing about his having invented a style of photography! Devotchka 19:12, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn.--Alhutch 20:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable... Google comes up with 1 relevent hit (though quite a few about Sir Hamo Thornycroft, who apparently died before he was born [1]).--Isotope23 20:52, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete patent vanity. "Photography from below" was common when I studied photography over 20 years ago, and if there is a genuinely new style going by this name then it is insignificant per Google. - Just zis Guy, you know? 21:04, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity and not notable. feydey 00:31, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity and non-notable. The Tokyo Art Beat website [2], which I rely on for news about the Tokyo art scene, has never heard of him. --Calton | Talk 00:12, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.