Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ham Day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete: the ham in question is covered in snow; I think we've given this one enough time. BencherliteTalk 15:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ham Day
I believe that this holiday is a non-notable subject that is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Should it become notable in the future, this article can be recreated. Marlith 01:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- User contested prod and hoax, non-notable ham day in britain, no refs or sources. —BoL 01:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I've accidentaly also nominated this exact same article for deletion. I have merged the reason here. —BoL 01:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable Christmas celebration based from the Great Britain. —BoL 01:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete per nom. Obvious hoax. Tevildo (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks to me like an attempt to give Christmas a non-religious-sounding name. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 02:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment A Google search turned up one legitimate hit, and three blogspot hits. Probably notable, and could be redirected to Turkey Day. —BoL 02:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I originally PRODded this and my belief is that this is the author's protologism which he's attempting to "hoax" into the language. There are no hits in any dictionary I could find for any meaning remotely close to this, including Urban Dictionary. Doesn't meet notability guidelines nor is it verifiable from trusted sources. Accounting4Taste:talk 02:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, obvious silly hoax. Lankiveil (talk) 04:48, 30 December 2007 (UTC).
- Delete I smell a hoax. Master of Puppets Care to share? 05:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete hoax for sure. docboat (talk) 10:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete yet another hoax Doc Strange (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as (nearly) patent nonsense and also per WP:SNOW.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Not really speediable. Dlohcierekim 14:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.