Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo Fanfiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Halo Fanfiction

Halo Fanfiction (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This is an unreferenced, non-notable, potentially endless list with no standards. Wikipedia is not the place for it. Erechtheus (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete unless multiple, WP:reliable, published sources can be found and used to demonstrate the notability/importance of the subject that is Halo-related fanfiction (NOT just the existence of). As it stands, this is just a poor laundry list of fan writings that would be of better use on the fanfiction 'publishing' website(s). -- saberwyn 01:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Comment Of course, an article on this genre of fan fiction would be welcome under the parameters of this project. The only reason I didn't approach this in that manner is that the text is so far away from that now. I agree with you is what I guess I'm saying. Erechtheus (talk) 01:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Needs reliable sources, has none. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete let me put it this way: there is no Star Trek fan fiction article (many fanfic terminologies come from there). Unsalvageable. JuJube (talk) 02:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Reliable sources are needed, none found. Soxred93 (u t) 04:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete WP:N. Five Years 05:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No reliable sources added to the article nor does it pass WP:N. It is also poorly written.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ wikify) 07:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't mind an organized and useful list, but this can never be either of those. It would be easy enough to clean up, but to what end? Regardless of any of that, the only "source" provided (which I had to open an editing window to find) is from a Halo forum - this article appears to be a cut-and-paste of it. Duncan1800 (talk) 09:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. This is an easy one. Poorly done, and not worth the effort anyway. --AnnaFrance (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like someone just writing something they made in a day (would give link, but forgot shortcut). RC-0722 ^247.5/1 22:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete!!! My god, get rid of this thing now--it should've been speedied as patent caca a long time ago. Qworty (talk) 00:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete and salt If I recall, I had this article speedily deleted last week (although the title was a bit different).--CyberGhostface (talk) 00:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Wikipedia isn't for things made up one day, and that's pretty much what fanfiction is. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 00:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Hopeless garbage. Someone needs to close this as snowball and delete immediately. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 02:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.