Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo Fanatics Must Live
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 14:15, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Halo Fanatics Must Live
The site is non-notable
- While I congratulate the site's ethos, it simply isn't notable enough (Google test for site's URL) to warrant an article about it. Sockatume 15:28, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable. Orange Goblin 15:30, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- don't delete hfml is one of the biggest forums in freeforum101.com 24.177.168.111 15:36, 2005 May 15 (according to history Uncle G 16:21, 2005 May 15 (UTC))
- Comment: Don't delete 70.106.102.249 15:46, 2005 May 15 (according to history. 24.177.168.111 edited this vote, apparently in good faith. I've restored the original. Uncle G 16:21, 2005 May 15 (UTC))
- Delete, not notable. --W(t) 15:52, 2005 May 15 (UTC)
-
- Comment: The Wikipedia isn't meant to record the entire internet. That's what the Internet Archive is for. If you have a look around, you'll notice that precious few forums are notable enough to be included in the wikipedia. Those that are included are typically attached to a highly notable website, or have interesting histories around which to base an article. Aside from stating where HFML is and that it's a Halo forum on free web space, what would an article on it contain? Sockatume 16:28, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: as a matter of fact it has a farly intresting past, involving rebellion, bannings...and many other theatric eliments...I just havn't gotten to adding the history yet...if you would care to look at old topics on the forum, you might get a idea of the history, as I hate to covor things up by deleting them...if you gave me some more time, I would have added the history, along with documents on the rebellion that took place on its "parent forum" www.halobabies.net User:dum
- Comment: Bear in mind that these things have to be interesting to non-insiders. I mean, there are countless fascinating in-jokes and events on my forum of choice, but I don't presume that the future ages are going to be interested in them. Sockatume 16:38, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: in all realty there ain't many inside things, and any of them i would be sure to explain fully.
- I could write gallons about TRM's "that train has sailed" mixed-metaphors slip-up, and perfectly detail the origins of it and exactly what happened so anyone could understand it... but would anyone outside of the forum care? The answer I leave up to you. Master Thief Garrett 07:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: in all realty there ain't many inside things, and any of them i would be sure to explain fully.
- Comment: Bear in mind that these things have to be interesting to non-insiders. I mean, there are countless fascinating in-jokes and events on my forum of choice, but I don't presume that the future ages are going to be interested in them. Sockatume 16:38, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: as a matter of fact it has a farly intresting past, involving rebellion, bannings...and many other theatric eliments...I just havn't gotten to adding the history yet...if you would care to look at old topics on the forum, you might get a idea of the history, as I hate to covor things up by deleting them...if you gave me some more time, I would have added the history, along with documents on the rebellion that took place on its "parent forum" www.halobabies.net User:dum
- Comment: The Wikipedia isn't meant to record the entire internet. That's what the Internet Archive is for. If you have a look around, you'll notice that precious few forums are notable enough to be included in the wikipedia. Those that are included are typically attached to a highly notable website, or have interesting histories around which to base an article. Aside from stating where HFML is and that it's a Halo forum on free web space, what would an article on it contain? Sockatume 16:28, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete.EvilPhoenix 16:16, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete POV/vanity. It is fairly unique in the fact that not only dose it rely completely on free web hosting it’s also never intendeds to get a professional domain. yeah right. If you are so unique, let someone neutral post an article. DoubleBlue (Talk) 17:04, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
Comment whatever, i never said anything about not letting them post...nothing is stopping them...
- Delete. completetly unknown with 3 googlehits. -MarSch 18:11, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity. POV. Unnotability. Killtacular. Nestea 18:48, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable forum with 37 members. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 19:13, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity. R Calvete 00:08, 2005 May 16 (UTC)
- Delete, last night I added it to my to-be-deleted list but you beat me to it! Master Thief Garrett 04:16, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 06:07, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
