The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Author is hereby advised to write future hoaxes in a more encyclopedic tone. Weregerbil 15:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete as pure bollocks. Akradecki 15:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete as a hoax. Nuttah68 21:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.