Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haim Zut

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Haim Zut

Haim Zut (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I changed the Prod to AFD because personally I think he is notable but am pretty sure that it is debateable. I say Keep but for reference please take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haim Gidon (2nd nomination). One other thing is that I thought for a moment both these people were the same - I think they are different.Peter Rehse 06:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Placer of {{prod}} voting Delete. I found this article as part of Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles. I searched for and did not find reference to meet WP:BIO, WP:NOR and WP:V. Of the 70 some non mirror references on ghits, all of the ones I looked at where primary references or advertisements. I would like to thank Peter Rehse for bringing the article to AfD when he removed the prod :) and I would like to request that if anyone finds or has references to meet WP:BIO and WP:V please add them to the article. Jeepday (talk) 13:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - lacks media coverage Addhoc 21:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless significant coverage from reliable, independent sources are found Corpx 04:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as no sourced claims of notability --Nate1481( t/c) 09:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.